Legal Opinion

State v. Creech

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1949PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the facts as above: We are here confronted with (1) the ruling on the motion for a continuance, (2) objections to admissions and exclusions of evidence, and (3) exceptions to the charge.

I. Motion for continuance: In support of the motion for a continuance, counsel for defendant submitted affidavits from Doctors J. F. Owen and Watson Wharton, each affirming his unpreparedness to give expert testimony in the case without first conferring with Dr. Haywood Taylor, toxicologist at Duke University, to whom a specimen of defendant’s blood had been sent for examination and…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API