Legal Opinion
Israel Discount Bank Ltd. v. Rosen
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
On these appeals, we are asked to decide whether summary judgment was properly granted to plaintiff bank as a holder in due course of certain promissory notes.
Plaintiff is a bank which operates out of the Diamond Exchange in Ramat-Gan, Israel. Defendants are diamond merchants who have in the past engaged in numerous transactions involving the purchase and sale of diamonds. Rappaport and Fishman, doing business as Consolidated Jewelry Co. (Consolidated), and Rosen regularly purchased diamonds from Siegman and, as part of the transaction, executed promissory notes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Chemical Bank v. HaskellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- First International Bank of Israel, Ltd. v. L. Blankstein & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Terranova v. EmilNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- First International Bank of Israel, Ltd. v. L. Blankstein & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- LTV Energy Products Co. v. Northern States Contracting Co. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Union Bank of India v. Seven Seas Imports, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Carador v. Sana Travel Service, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- J & B Schoenfeld Fur Merchants, Inc. v. Kilbourne & Donohue, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.