Legal Opinion

J & B Schoenfeld Fur Merchants, Inc. v. Kilbourne & Donohue, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 18, 1989No. 88 Civ. 3584 (KC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CONBOY, District Judge:

This diversity action arises out of the failure to pay a promissory note in the sum of $35,000, payable March 2, 1987. The motions currently before the Court include plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and defendant Delveseo-vo’s cross-motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).

BACKGROUND

On December 1, 1986, defendant Kil-bourne & Donohue, Inc., by its president, Timothy Delvescovo, executed a promissory note to the order of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stroll v. EpsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Schultz v. Wills (In Re Wills)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  3. Bank Leumi Trust Co. of New York v. WulkanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Guglielmo v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API