Legal Opinion
Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 10, 1969PublishedCited by 271 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.
The plaintiff, Intercontinental Planning, Limited is a New York corporation engaged in the business of bringing-together European and American firms desiring to enter into business relationships. By this action plaintiff seeks to recover a finder’s fee of $2,781,848 for its alleged services with respect to the acquisition in 1962 of a New Jersey electronics corporation, Daystrom, Incorporated, by defendant Schlumberger, Limited.1 Defendants deny that plaintiff played any role with respect to this acquisition, and assert that neither they nor Daystrom ever requested or agreed to pay…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Poel v. . Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by271 opinions
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & StolarzNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.