Legal Opinion
H. G. Fenton Material Co. v. Noble
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 3, 1932No. Docket No. 963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
In this action, brought under the so-called Public Works Act (Stats. 1919, p. 487), as amended (Stats. 1925, p. 538), the plaintiff sought to recover for materials furnished to a contractor for use in the construction of a public highway.
Among other things, the complaint alleged that the defendant Noble entered into a contract with the county of San Diego whereby he agreed to construct a certain paved road, and that in accordance with the provisions of the act, the defendant Noble, as principal, and the defendant Federal Surety Company as surety, executed a labor and material bond. If is then…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prince v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Williamson v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- A. L. Young MacHinery Co. v. CuppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. Richardson Bldg. & Eng'g Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Cooley v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- W. Harrison Price v. H. L. Coble Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- California Electric Supply Co. v. United Pacific Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Glens Falls Insurance Company v. Murray Plumbing and Heating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964