Funk v. Rentchler
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Owen Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
The appellants sued the appellees to set aside a conveyance by George Funk and the appellant Barbara Funk, his wife, to the appellee Henry Rentchler, because of the alleged unsoundness of mind of said George at the time of said conveyance, there having been no adjudication of such unsoundness of mind at the time of such conveyance.
The second paragraph of answer pleads generally that the guardian of said George, after his appointment as such, with full knowledge of all of the facts and circumstances alleged in the complaint, fully ratified and confirmed all the contracts and conveyances…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ross v. MenefeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Hammann v. MinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- McFadden v. FritzIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Jones v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Shaw v. Meyer-Kiser BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- King v. SipleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Webber v. SpencerNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.