Legal Opinion

Hammann v. Mink

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1884No. 10,562PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From tlie Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C. —

The appellant, an infant, by her next friend, brought this action for the partition of certain real estate, improved and used as a brewery, situated in Wayne county, in this State, alleging in her complaint that she owned an undivided one-sixth and the appellee the residue, as tenants in common.

The appellee filed an answer of two paragraphs. The first was the general denial, and the second alleged, at great, length, that Christian Hammann died intestate, seized of the land in question, leaving his widow, Caroline Hammann, and the appellant as his only heirs at law, and that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atkins v. KinnanNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Boyd v. OlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Brooster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Jessup v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Spaulding v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Klingler v. OttingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Kerfoot v. KessenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Walker v. GoldsmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API