Legal Opinion

Stagner v. Craig

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1929PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The Court of Appeals has affirmed a judgment for damages for the killing of a dog by defendant driving a motor ear on the public highway. The case is here on petition for certiorari, which has been granted and argument heard.

The negligent killing and the amount of the award are questions of fact settled by the judgments of the lower courts, but petitioner here invokes application of our statute, Shan. Code, Sec. 28'53a4, declaring it unlawful for the owner or keeper of a dog to allow the dog to go upon a highway, subject to exceptions not pertinent here. Violation of this statute was held, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BodemerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GambillTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. RoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. WillifordTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Inter-City Trucking Co. v. DanielsTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Odum v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  4. Long v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  5. Consolidated Coach Co., Inc. v. McCordTennessee Supreme Court · 1937

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API