Legal Opinion

Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Williford

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1905PublishedCited by 24 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Shelby County.— J. P. Young, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

This suit was brought by the administrator of one Owen to recover damages in the interest of certain statutory beneficiaries against several railroads, constituting what is called in the record the “Frisco System,” for inflicting, as is alleged in the declaration, by actionable negligence, injuries on his intestate which soon after resulted in his death. On the trial of the case there was a verdict and judgment for $6,500 against the defendants, and they have prosecuted an appeal, in the nature of a writ of error, to this court.

It is disclosed in the record that the deceased lived in *111Mississip…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Railroad Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Trow v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  5. Kentucky Central Railroad v. Thomas' adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Street v. CalvertTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Power Packing Co. v. BorumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API