Estate of Maurer

The respondent contends that this court is without jurisdiction because the order appealed from is not appealable. We are constrained to sustain this contention. No claims were filed against the estate but that of claimant. Pier claim consisted of many separate items. Plearing on the claim was duly had and the county judge filed a writing consisting of five typewritten eight-by-twelve pages which he denominated and which is indorsed as a “Decision on claim of Pauline Maurer,” in which he considered each item separately and found the amount due therefor. This writing concludes as follows:…