Legal Opinion
Gilbert v. Hoard
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 1930PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The plaintiff moved to strike certain allegations from -defendant’s answer on the ground that they did not constitute a defense. The court granted the motion to strike. The defendant appeals from the order granting the motion.
It has been definitely decided by this court that an order striking matter from a complaint on the ground that it is irrelevant is not appealable. Wiesmann v. Shanley, 124 Wis. 431, 102 N. W. 932. Following this it was decided that an order striking matter from an answer as irrelevant is not appealable. Gooding v. Doyle, 134 Wis. 623, 115 N. W. 114; State v. Lewis, 164…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wisconsin Real Estate Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Hyde v. German National Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Wisconsin Face & Fire Brick Co. v. Southern Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Gooding v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Stafford v. General Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- McCarthy v. SteinkellnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Brand v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.