Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Zilisch v. Auer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1928PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 7, 1928:

Stevens, J.(1) Motion to dismiss appeal. The relators moved to dismiss the appeal on two grounds: First. That the “opinion and decision” of the trial court did not constitute an appealable order. The relators concede that an order denying a motion to quash is appealable, but they insist that this is not such an order, but a mere direction that such order should be entered later.

In determining whether any particular form of judicial action is appealable, “it is not the form of the determination but the nature of the adjudication that is to be…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State ex rel. Van Alstine v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Adams v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State ex rel. Attorney General v. O'NeillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Buse v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kukor v. GroverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Wheeler School District No. 152 v. HawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1943

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API