Legal Opinion
Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 15, 1991No. 49-56 Western District Appeal Dkts. 1989PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*5OPINION OF THE COURT
PAPADAKOS, Justice.*
In March of 1984 Edmund and Janice Zinsser entered into an agreement with Butler Petroleum Company which provided that Butler Petroleum would refurbish Zinsser’s gasoline station, fitting it, among other things, with gasoline tanks, appropriate plumbing and pumps for the tanks, a Texaco credit card imprinter, a Texaco sign, and a complete exterior painting scheme following the Texaco pattern. In return, the Zinssers would purchase petroleum products from Butler Petroleum for a certain length of time. Additionally, the agreement contained an indemnity…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- DePAUL v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Clement v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Kiewit Eastern Co., Inc. v. L & R Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Topp Copy Products, Inc. v. SingletarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Widmer Engineering, Inc. v. DufallaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.