State v. Board
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Since we dispose of the case on other grounds, the question of entrapment, vigorously debated in the briefs, is not reached.
For reasons which follow, we hold that defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence should have been allowed.
To withstand a motion for nonsuit there must be substantial evidence against the accused of all material elements of the offense. State v. Lee, 294 N.C. 299, 240 S.E. 2d 449 (1978), and cases cited therein; State v. Allred, 279 N.C. 398, 183 S.E. 2d 553 (1971), and cases cited therein. Evidence which is sufficient…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SellarsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. StithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.