Maryland Casualty Co. v. Beebe
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
This is an action at law upon an accident insurance policy. The case was tried to a jury, but at the conclusion of the evidence there was no dispute as to the facts on two decisive issues. The defendant moved for an instructed verdict, and, while the plaintiff made no such motion formally, her counsel did advise the court that he did not see any question of fact to be submitted to the jury. Thereupon the trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiff. We think the parties submitted the case to the court for its decision; we see nothing of substance to go to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zeller's Lessee v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- McIntire v. PryorSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Howbert v. PenroseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Krauss Brothers Lumber Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Goldsmith v. KoopmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
- Amen v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Fidelity Union Life Insurance Company v. MethvenTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Condor Petroleum Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.