Goldsmith v. Koopman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree canceling, as obtained by fraud, an assignment executed by complainant October 3, 1891, by which complainant and one Reizenstein transferred to the defendant and others all their interest in certain patented inventions and in the profits arising from a license agreement which they had made with John H. Brigham.
The undisputed facts of the case as disclosed by the proofs are these: Prior to April, 1891, the complainant Goldsmith had made an invention relating to coin holders or pocket banks, for which he had obtained letters patent in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Heath v. Erie Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1871
- Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
3Cited by13 opinions
- Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Turner v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. Carbon County Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.