Legal Opinion

Howbert v. Penrose

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1930No. 19-9578PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

The taxpayer, Spencer Penrose, sued the Collector of Internal Revenue to recover $85,799.04 income tax for the year 1918, paid by him under protest on July 1, 1924. A jury was waived in writing. The trial court beard tbe testimony, made findings of fact, and as a conclusion of law therefrom found that tbe plaintiff was entitled to recover $63,870.19 and interest, on account of the refusal of tbe government to allow a deduction for losses growing out of the sale of shares of stock in three copper companies —hereafter called the “copper stocks”; but denied the plaintiff…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Turks Head Club v. BroderickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  2. Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. Sibyl Herrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. TolbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ScatenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API