Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1894No. 16,900PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This action was begun in the Pulaski Circuit Court, and was taken, on change of venue, to the court below. It was brought by the appellee, the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, against the appellees Gellinger and wife and Sourbeer and wife, to foreclose two mortgages, one against the Gellingers and one against the Sourbeers.

The appellants were also made defendants to assert' any right which they might have. They filed their answer, and also a cross-complaint, to foreclose a mortgage *327set up by them against tlie insurance company, the Gel-lingers and the Sourbeers, all of whom answered…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Parker v. State ex rel. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Barnes v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Gans v. . ThiemeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Boley v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  2. Mills v. Magee Carpet Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Jones v. MayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API