Legal Opinion
Bethlehem Steel Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided December 30, 1964No. C.D. 2500PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence, Judge:
The Bethlehem Steel Company and the Maryland Shipbuilding & Drydock Co., plaintiffs herein, brought into the United States at the port of Baltimore, Md., two so-called “midbodies.”
They were classified by the collector of customs within the provision for “Articles or wares not specially provided for, whether partly or wholly manufactured * * * in chief value of steel” in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- The Robert W. ParsonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Buck Kreihs Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Vancor Steamship Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Knappton Corp. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969