Copper Country Mobile Home Park v. City of Globe
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Judge.
The plaintiff/appellee, Copper Country Mobile Home Park, a partnership, commenced this action in the trial court to enforce a- contract obligation of defendant/appellant, City of Globe, a municipal corporation. Plaintiff/appellee, Hancor Properties, Inc., an Arizona corporation, was later added as a plaintiff. The trial court granted the appellees’ motion for summary judgment and this appeal was taken from that judgment.
Appellant urges that the trial court erred:
1) In finding the city bound by the contract, and
2) In determining that there was no disputed material fact…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Tucson v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mariano & Assoc., PC v. Board of County Com'rs of Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Greenawalt v. Sun City West Fire DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Tryon v. Avra Valley Fire DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1986
- YUMA VALLEY LAND CO., LLC v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.