Legal Opinion

Copper Country Mobile Home Park v. City of Globe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 7, 1981No. 2 CA-CIV 3929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

The plaintiff/appellee, Copper Country Mobile Home Park, a partnership, commenced this action in the trial court to enforce a- contract obligation of defendant/appellant, City of Globe, a municipal corporation. Plaintiff/appellee, Hancor Properties, Inc., an Arizona corporation, was later added as a plaintiff. The trial court granted the appellees’ motion for summary judgment and this appeal was taken from that judgment.

Appellant urges that the trial court erred:

1) In finding the city bound by the contract, and

2) In determining that there was no disputed material fact…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. City of Tucson v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mariano & Assoc., PC v. Board of County Com'rs of Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Greenawalt v. Sun City West Fire DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  3. Tryon v. Avra Valley Fire DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1986
  4. YUMA VALLEY LAND CO., LLC v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API