Legal Opinion

Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of Denver

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1995No. Nos. 93CA1395, 93CA1410PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge BRIGGS.

In this consolidated appeal, plaintiffs, various water districts, water and sanitation districts, and the City of Littleton (collectively, distributors), appeal the trial court’s judgment for defendant City and County of Denver (Denver), acting by and through its Board of Water Commissions (Board). The distributors’ claims, for breach of contract, discriminatory and unreasonable rate setting, and declaratory judgment, arose out of an ongoing dispute over rates the Board can charge to the distributors and their customers for water and related services. We affirm in part,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Corenswet, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. KN Energy, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Fibreglas Fabricators, Inc. v. KylbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Voodoo Leatherworks LLC v. Waste Connections US, IncDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API