Legal Opinion
In re Molten Metal Technology, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 11, 2003No. Nos. 97-21385-CJK, to 97-21389-CJKPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON APPLICATION OF LATHAM & WATKINS FOR FINAL COMPENSATION AND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT AS SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE DEBTORS
CAROL J. KENNER, Bankruptcy Judge.
The law firm of Latham & Watkins (“L & W” or “the firm”) has applied under 11 U.S.C. § 330 for final compensation and expense reimbursement for services it rendered and expenses it incurred as special counsel to the Debtors in these jointly administered cases. The United States Trustee and the Chapter 11 Trustee oppose the application on numerous grounds. One basis advanced by the Trustee is that the firm, in seeking…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In Re Larry T. & Cynthia J. Martin D/B/A a & W Drive-In Restaurant & Martin's Exxon, Debtors. Appeal of Larry T. & Cynthia J. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Bernard P. Rome v. Joseph Braunstein, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- In the Matter of Taxman Clothing Company, Debtor. Appeal of Arthur Winer, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Kaplan Breslaw Ash, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Barber v. Dunbar (In Re Dunbar)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2004
- In Re Harris Agency, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy v. SillerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- In Re: Mallinckrodt plcDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022