Legal Opinion
United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 8, 1997No. S1 95 cr 737 (SS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Defendants move, pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 21(b), to change the venue of this action from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of Texas. Further, defendants move to dismiss a portion of Count 1, as well as Counts 2 through 16 and 17 through 31 of the Indictment on the ground that the statute upon which the prosecution of these counts is based, 18 U.S.C. § 2512, is unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons to be discussed, defendants’ motions are DENIED.
BACKGROUND
The Spy Factory “is a retail store concept developed in…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BiroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. QuinnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- United States v. ElsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. MotzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.