Legal Opinion
United States v. Quinn
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 23, 2005No. CRIM. 05-0018(JDB)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
On April 28, 2005, a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia handed up a six-count indictment charging Robert E. Quinn and Michael H. Holland (“defendants”), both of Lexington, Kentucky — as well as a third individual, Mohammed A. Sharbaf of Iran — with violating laws restricting the export of goods and technolo gy from the United States to Iran. Trial of defendants is scheduled to begin on November 7, 2005. The parties have filed more than a dozen pre-trial motions, and the Court has received briefing on those motions and heard oral argument…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Sanford, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. AmirnazmiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Zhi Yong GuoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Smith v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. BowdoinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.