Legal Opinion
United States v. Biro
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 17, 1998No. 97-4143PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCÓN, Senior Circuit Judge:
Steve Alon, Eliezer Arce, John Biro, and John Demeter appeal from the judgment of conviction entered following their jury trial. Alón and Arce were convicted of conspiring to send electronic surreptitious surveillance devices (“ESIDs”) through the mail, or in interstate or foreign commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2512(l)(a), to possess or sell ESIDs, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2512(l)(b), and to smuggle-merchandise into the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545. Alon and Arce were also convicted of the substantive offenses prohibited by §…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Jae Gab KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Giraldo-PradoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- United States v. Tony DeVaughn NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.