Legal Opinion

United States v. Motz

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 14, 2009No. 2:08-cv-00598PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

On November 19, 2008, a superseding indictment issued charging Defendants George Motz (“Motz” or “the Defendant”) and Melhado, Flynn & Associates, Inc. (“MFA”) with one count of securities fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1348(1) (“Count One”), and one count of document alteration, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1519 (“Count Two”), in connection with a fraudulent “cherry-picking” scheme. Presently before the Court is a motion by Motz to dismiss the indictment or, in the alternative, to transfer venue to the Southern District of New York.

I.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Picard v. Legacy Capital Ltd. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. United States v. MahaffyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Michael CosciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. MurgioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  5. United States v. GreenlawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API