Legal Opinion

Saldukas v. McKerns

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1940No. Appeal, 163PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiffs brought this action in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the then minor plaintiff, who, since suit, has reached his majority. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, defendant moved for a compulsory nonsuit, which motion was granted by the learned trial judge. This appeal was taken from the refusal of the court en banc to take off the nonsuit.

At the time of the accident defendant was engaged in the general contracting business and was constructing a new highway on State Highway Route No. 120 in Schuylkill County. An employee, Calvin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zahniser v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Corbin v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Tusko Et Ux. v. LynettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Jacamino v. Harrison Motor Freight Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marter v. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Miller v. Delaware County Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Meyer v. HarveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Miller v. Delaware County Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Moore v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API