Meyer v. Harvey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
Action of trespass for personal injuries. Verdict for plaintiff. Judgment for defendant non obstan te vere-dicto refused and judgment entered for plaintiff on the verdict. Defendant appealed.
The undisputed evidence of the plaintiff — defendant offered no testimony — was as follows:
The plaintiff, Meyer, was employed by the Rudolph Wurlitzer Company as a general maintenance man at its building No. 719 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh. He tended the furnace, made repairs, operated elevators, both freight and passenger, and worked generally about the building. A part of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zahniser v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Norris v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Saldukas v. McKernsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Schilling v. Pittsburgh Engineering, Foundry & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934