Legal Opinion

Tusko Et Ux. v. Lynett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1937No. Appeal, 150PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

The legally significant facts in this case — selecting from the testimony those most favorable to plaintiffs — • may be summarized as follows: Defendants’ truck, manned by a driver and helper, delivered bundles of newspapers daily to various places in the vicinity of Scranton. A newsboy named Tatko operated his own independent delivery route in the village of Richmondale, and it was his custom each day to obtain his papers from defendants’ truck when the latter arrived at Richmondale Road. Joseph Tusko, a fourteen-year-old schoolboy, became a partner of Tatko, who…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zavodnick v. Rose SonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Byrne v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Corbin v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. D'Allesandro v. BentivogliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Hartigan v. Public LedgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Muroski v. HnathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Borzik v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Slother v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Jacamino v. Harrison Motor Freight Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Jackson v. Fort Pitt Hotel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API