Lankford v. Holton
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
Every applicant Cor the benefits under the land-registration act (Ga. L. 1917, p. 108; Code, § 60-101 et seq.) must stand on the strength of his own application, and not upon the weakness of his adversary’s title. In proving such title as will entitle him to registration and a decree in his favor, the same rules of law apply as in suits for the recovery of possession of land by ejectment or statutory 'complaint for land:. Thomasson v. Coleman, 176 Ga. 375 (167 S. E. 879); Rock Run Iron Co. v. Miller, 156 Ga. 136, 141 (118 S. E. 670); Smith v. Board of Education, 168 Ga. 755…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Neill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BeasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Allen Kane's Major Dodge, Inc. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Myers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- State v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Pantone v. PantoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.