Myers v. Phillips
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The rule in this State is that a party to a suit is not rendered incompetent to give testimony therein unless such party falls within some exception in the Code, § 38-1603. It is claimed by the defendant in error that the proffered testimony of Mrs. Myers, the plaintiff in error, was properly excluded under subsection 1 of the cited section, which reads as follows: “Where any suit shall be instituted or defended by a person insane at the time of trial, or by an indorsee, assignee, or transferee, or the personal representative of a deceased person, the opposite party shall not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Nugent v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Mays v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Ross v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Allen Kane's Major Dodge, Inc. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- McCurry v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Cohen v. HartlageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.