Legal Opinion

Myers v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1944No. 14819PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The rule in this State is that a party to a suit is not rendered incompetent to give testimony therein unless such party falls within some exception in the Code, § 38-1603. It is claimed by the defendant in error that the proffered testimony of Mrs. Myers, the plaintiff in error, was properly excluded under subsection 1 of the cited section, which reads as follows: “Where any suit shall be instituted or defended by a person insane at the time of trial, or by an indorsee, assignee, or transferee, or the personal representative of a deceased person, the opposite party shall not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Nugent v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Mays v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Ross v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Allen Kane's Major Dodge, Inc. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McCurry v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Cohen v. HartlageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API