Legal Opinion

State v. Hester

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 2004No. A04A0125PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Scott Hayward Hester was charged with two counts of driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”) and with making an illegal U-turn. The trial court granted Hester’s motion to suppress all evidence gathered following the stop of his vehicle. It is from this ruling that the state appeals. We affirm.

*502When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence, the appellate court should be guided by three principles with regard to the interpretation of the trial court’s judgment of the facts. First, ... [the] judge sits as the trier of facts. The…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Page v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API