National Bank v. Schwartz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 This is a deficiency action following a trustee’s sale. Richard and Sigrid Schwartz (homeowners) appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion to compel arbitration as required under National Bank of Arizona’s (Bank’s) promissory note. Finding arbitration is required, we reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In February 2007, the Bank loaned homeowners $1,360,000 secured by a deed of trust on their real property located in Scottsdale, Arizona. Homeowners executed a promissory note on the debt that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Bank of Douglas v. NeelArizona Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Sun Valley Ranch 308 Ltd. Partnership v. RobsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Morgan AZ Financial, L.L.C. v. GotsesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- ZB, N.A. v. HoellerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Monroe v. Az AcreageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.