Legal Opinion
Lurline Gardens Ltd. Housing Partnership v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 28, 1997No. 95-607CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*416 Order
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
Defendant has moved for partial summary judgment on count one of the complaint, for breach of contract. (The other count is for a Fifth Amendment taking.)1 The motion is granted.
Background
Plaintiffs Lurline Gardens Limited Housing Partnership (“Lurline”) and Phoenix Gardens Limited Housing Partnership (“Phoenix”) were organized in Southern California for the purpose of participating as housing developers in a housing program of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) (within the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)),2 pursuant to section 236 of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Sucesion J. Serralles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Greenbrier (Lake County Trust Co. No. 1391) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Chancellor Manor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Silver State Land LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020