Legal Opinion

Chancellor Manor v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2001No. 98-39 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Senior Judge.

The plaintiffs in this action are each the owner of a multifamily rental housing project whose construction was financed with a low-cost mortgage loan insured by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to section 236 of the National Housing Act, as amended. Plaintiffs assert *140that they each entered into a contract with the United States, through the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which granted them the right to prepay their mortgages without government approval after 20 years, and thereby free themselves of regulations limiting…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Chancellor Manor, Gateway Investors, Ltd., and Oak Grove Towers Associates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  3. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API