Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re: Eric Alexander Farris

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 2015No. SC94418Published

1DissentGeorge W. Draper Iii, Judge

Missouri courts have heretofore adhered to a system of progressive discipline. In re Forck, 418 S.W.3d 437, 444 (Mo. banc 2014). This system was not established to punish attorneys for their actions, but rather, is designed to protect the public and maintain the integrity of the legal profession. In re Stewart, 342 S.W.3d 307, 308 (Mo, banc 2011). The' principal opinion abandons these principles in that it seeks' to punish Eric Alexander Farris (hereinafter, “Farris”). It further abandons this Court’s duty to protect the public in that by disbarring Farris, the Court loses all authority and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re BelzSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. In Re ColemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Matter of WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. In Re StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. In Re EhlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API