Legal Opinion

Bagby v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 8, 2000No. 99-4011-RDRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROGERS, District Judge.

This is a diversity action. Plaintiffs contend that they sustained certain losses due to the acts or omissions of the brokerage firm Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. This matter is presently before the court upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The defendant contends that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. Having heard oral argument on the defendant’s motion, the court is now prepared to rule.

I

A court grants a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Moss v. MamalisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  3. S-G Metals Industries, Inc. v. New England Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. Hutton v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  5. Mohr v. Tatro (In Re Tatro)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API