Moss v. Mamalis
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rulon, C.J.:
Plaintiff Joseph K. Moss appeals the district court’s awards of summaiy judgment in favor of defendants James T. Mamalis, Tiffany Jones, and the State of Kansas. Plaintiff argues the district court erroneously found the statute of limitations barred plaintiff s legal malpractice claim against Mamalis and erroneously found tort liability did not extend to Tiffany Jones and the State of Kansas on the negligence and civil rights claims presented. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
On January 17, 2001, the district court revoked the plaintiff s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, and Harold Cranke and Benjamin SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Fox v. CustisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Everton v. WillardSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Jeanes v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Martell v. DriscollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Davis v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Espinosa v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.