Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Reid
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 21, 1930No. 19921PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and the defendants in error were defendants in the trial court. W!e will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court.
Concretely stated, the facts from which this controversy arose are as follows: The city of Woodward is the owner of an electric light and power plant. Bonds were issued and sold for the installation and construction of this plant and for its improvement from time to time, and it is operated by the city as a public utility. In the month of June, 1928, the defendant Western Light & Bower Corporation, being…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- People v. HardingMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Rathbone v. . WirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Stewart v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- Meder v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Protest of ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Groskins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- Grim v. CordellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.