Legal Opinion

People v. Cowles

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1956No. Crim. A. 50PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagler, P. J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of a violation of section 123 of the Oakland Traffic Code, which reads as follows:

“It shall be unlawful for any person to park or leave standing any vehicle in any parking meter zone on any street, at any time during which the parking meter shows, indicates, registers or displays that the parking space is illegally in use, except during the time necessary to deposit United States coins in said parking meter so as to show, indicate, register, display or permit legal parking, and excepting also during the time from 6:00 p. m. to 8:00 a. m., and excepting…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. City of Tulare v. HevrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Ex parte DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Marysville Woolen Mills v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Tilton v. RussekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Lewiston v. FraryIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. DudleyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1967
  3. Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Marc D. Leh v. General Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API