Legal Opinion

State v. Barber

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1979No. 40465PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was charged by information with operation of a motor vehicle without the owner’s consent and with two counts of second-degree burglary and stealing. On appeal from his conviction on all charges, defendant asserts that the prosecuting attorney’s opening statement was fatally defective in failing to state facts to support the motor vehicle charge and the first burglary count; that the trial court erred in admitting certain hearsay testimony over objection to establish ownership of a television that had been taken in one of the burglaries; that it was error to instruct the jury on the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. State v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State v. FentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Lewis v. HubertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. State v. OgleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. GobbleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. WaltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Coday v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API