Legal Opinion

Yates v. Sturgis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 1, 1993No. 92-281PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Cathryn Chadwick Yates, appellant, and Floyd and Vanessa Sturgis, appellees, own adjoining tracts of land inside the City of Arkadelphia. Appellant Yates alleges that part of her tract is landlocked, or, in other words, blocked from the nearest city street by the appellees’ tract. She filed a petition in the County Court of Clark County, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 27-66-401 (1987), to establish a private road across appellees’ tract. The county court held that it was without jurisdiction to open a private road within the city limits and dismissed the petition.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Road Improvement District No. 1 v. GloverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Sanderson v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Pippin v. MaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Powell v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Armstrong v. HarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. EddingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. McGraw v. CrowdenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Barnett v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Maroney v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API