Legal Opinion
Red Wing Motel Investors v. Red Wing Fire Department
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 20, 1996No. CX-96-98PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Motel appeals summary judgment dismissing its claims as time-barred under Minn. Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a) (1994). We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent General Sprinkler Corporation designed a sprinkler system for the Red Wing Quiet House Best Western Motel (Motel). 1 It then bought parts and supplies and installed them. As a result of incorrectly pitched pipes, the sprinkler system drained improperly and a winter freeze led to extensive water damage.
Motel commenced suit against General Sprinkler nearly three years after the malfunction, alleging negligence, breach of warranties,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Cape Henry Towers, Inc. v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Larson v. Babcock & WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
3Cited by11 opinions
- Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services v. BendTec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Twinco Romax Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. Olson General Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nu Tone LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.