Legal Opinion

Twinco Romax Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. Olson General Contractors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 2002No. C2-01-1763PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORITSKY, Judge. *

Appellant brought this action, alleging that roof joists designed, supplied, and/or installed by respondents were defective. Respondents moved for dismissal and summary judgment, arguing that appellant’s suit was subject to the two-year statute of limitations for suits involving defects in improvements to real property. The district court agreed and dismissed appellant’s claim. On appeal, appellant contends that its claim is subject to an exception to the two-year limitations statute because the allegedly defective roof joists qualify as “equipment or machinery.”

FACTS

T…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Cape Henry Towers, Inc. v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. MelendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nu Tone LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  3. Great Northern Insurance Co. v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Integrity Floorcovering v. Broan-NutoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Will & Appt of the Estate of: William C. Mackey, Dec'dCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API