Legal Opinion
Larson v. Babcock & Wilcox
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 27, 1994No. CX-94-1599PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellants Kent Larson, Clifford Nelson, and Hugh Stadem challenge the summary judgment, arguing the district court erroneously determined that Minn.Stat. § 541.051 operates to bar their claim against respondents Detroit Stoker Company and Babcock & Wilcox. Larson, Nelson, and Stadem contend their claim is within a 1990 amendment to the statute that allows claims against suppliers of machinery or equipment. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 17, 1990, Larson, Nelson, and Stadem were injured in a boiler explosion at the American Crystal Sugar plant in Crookston, Minnesota.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Hardy v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- School Board v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Independent School District No. 197 v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Red Wing Motel Investors v. Red Wing Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Sarafolean v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nu Tone LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Lenz v. Depositors Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Minnesota Souvenir Milkcaps, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.