Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 13, 1995No. 1583-92PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant’s trial ended when the trial judge sua sponte déclared a mistrial over appellant’s objection. Shortly before the second trial, appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus claiming retrial would violate the Constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. U.S. Const., art. V. The habeas judge denied relief and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Ex parte Brown, 839 S.W.2d 164 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine an important question of state or…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Ex Parte FierroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Ex Parte BruceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Ex Parte Perusquia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  5. Zavala v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API