Ex Parte Perusquia
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.
In this interlocutory appeal, Bernadette Perusquia contends the trial court erred in denying her pre-trial application for habe-as corpus relief because her retrial for murder is barred by double jeopardy. Specifically, Perusquia argues the trial court that presided over her trial abused its discretion by prematurely declaring a mistrial during the jury’s deliberations, over her objection and without manifest necessity; therefore, a retrial is barred by double jeopardy. Based on the record before us, we are unable to say the trial court abused its…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ex Parte Joseph Montano, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Ex Parte Ronald Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
- Peter Anthony Traylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Carter, Ex Parte Justin RiverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ex Parte Alejandro Rivera Saavedra v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.