Ex Parte Bruce
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
Appellant Glen Ray Bruce appeals from the denial of a pretrial writ of habeas corpus. In his sole point, he contends that the trial court erred by sua sponte declaring a mistrial for ineffective assistance of counsel where no “manifest necessity” existed. We affirm.
Background
Appellant was charged with aggravated sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child. The trial court had previously granted the State’s motion in limine that prevented defense counsel from discussing specific instances of misconduct under Texas Rule of Evidence 608. Tex.R. Evtd.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ex Parte KarlsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Ex Parte CraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Ex Parte Dangelo, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Leonard Pierson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.