Legal Opinion

In re Leggett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1984No. 832DC807PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, respondent contends that the court had no jurisdiction over him in that the record fails to show that he and one of his parents were properly served with the juvenile summons and petition, as required by G.S. 7A-565. It is true that the return of the summons states only that service was effected March 30, 1983 and does not state who was served. But this does not necessarily mean, as respondent argues, that the court had no jurisdiction. It is the service of summons, rather than the return of the officer, that confers jurisdiction. State v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. State v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Calmes v. . LambertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Strayhorn v. . BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API