Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

Tbe appellant, in tbe affidavit filed in support of its motion, does not assert that T. S. Wood was not its local agent at tbe time of the service of tbe sci. fa. Nor does it deny that tbe sci. fa. was served on him. It excepts to tbe action of tbe court in allowing tbe sheriff to amend bis return and to tbe findings that (1) tbe return of tbe sheriff as amended cures tbe defect in tbe service, and (2) the sci. fa. was, in law, ■served on it. These exceptions are without substantial merit.

It is tbe service of summons and not tbe return of tbe officer that confers jurisdiction. G.S. 1-101. Tbe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clements v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. Grady v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Calmes v. . LambertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Lee v. . HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Lee v. HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hassell v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Castro v. UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Troy Lumber Co. v. State Sewing Machine Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Williams v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Bentley v. Watauga Building Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API